![]() |
||||
| |
||||
|
By Joseph Rieu (Class of 2005) Student Researcher, Center for the Study of Democracy
Just in time for the American elections, five Russian delegates met in Kent 317 on November 6, 2002, with Professor Susan Grogan's Parties and Elections class. The Russian Delegates were visiting St. Mary's College in conjunction with the independent Center for the Study of Democracy, in an effort to gain insight into "all levels of the electoral process," as delegate Sergey Zhabinskiy noted. As the activities of their visit suggest, the delegates had much to see in local elections in St. Mary's County, as well as some activities in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Sergey Zhabinskiy, red hair, center. listens to a St. Mary's College student make a point). Amongst the activities of the visiting delegates included meeting various candidates in St. Mary's County who were running for positions in the County government, observing electoral processes at the County level, predicting election results and visiting a polling firm and CNN studios. Based on their experience in the turbulent nature of Russian politics, there were "no real surprises" in the elections, according to the delegates. For the students in Professor Grogan's class, another dimension was added to their accumulating context of the American political system. The understanding of American political parties and the electoral system that was discussed throughout the semester in class has three parts: the party in the electorate, the party as organization, and the party in government. For the students, a comparative light was shone on all three areas.
Party in the Electorate In Russia there is an umbrella classification that is similar to that of the United States. The umbrella classification consists of "rightist," "leftist," and "centrist" groupings. Also, a phenomenon exists within post-Cold War Russia that is historically similar to patterns in the United States. In the midst of the turbulent economy that is struggling to gain stability in their nation, Russian citizens will vote Communist when the economy is showing signs of recession or depression. In the United States, Socialist patterns often develop in times of deep economic turmoil and uncertainty. Since the economic maturity that emerged after the Great Depression, however, the United States has not had any drastically turbulent downward swings. Also noted by the delegates was a phenomenon within the Russian electorate system known as "the Red Belt," which is a substantial portion of Central Russia that is controlled by the Communist Party and hard line conservatives.
Party as Organization The most surprising distinction revealed by the delegates is that there is a forty-eight hour period of deliberation before the general elections. "For two days, it is illegal to mention candidates or to say anything with influence," delegate Sergey Zhabinskiy noted. Among the other comparative notes, the delegates noted that fundraising holds similar importance to Russian party organizations as American ones.
Party in Government The Russians perceived the U.S. 2002 midterm elections to be a mandate for President George W. Bush's foreign policy. The common observation of President George W. Bush in Russia is that he is the "world's policeman." One delegate expressed disgust over "constant United States intervention,' particularly in the independent Republic of Chechnya, which stands in defiance of the wishes of the Russian Federation, and the brewing aggression in Iraq. Pertaining to the latter, the delegates expressed that the mentality in Asia and Europe is that the perceived threat the United States and its allies claim that Iraq poses is "unrealistic," and expressed that there are possibly ulterior economic and personal motives behind the aggression.
|
|
|||
|
|
||||
| For more information about program events and how you can contribute to the Center for the Study of Democracy, please contact the Program Assistant, Abby Meatyard, at 240-895-6432 or ammeatyard@smcm.edu. | ||||